Jeepers Creepers Meepers

Friday, June 24, 2005

In Defense of Tattoo

(Okay, not that guy on TV!)



On Tuesday, Darrell posted a photo and critique of a young man who had chosen to cover himself in tattoos whose content was rather off the beaten path. Well, weird and a little unnerving, to be precise. In the ensuing commentary, Darrell states:

A lot of people get tattoed, pierced, dyed, augmented, boob-jobbed, etc, to make no statement more complex than this one: LOOK AT ME! NOW!!.

While I agree that there are some people with that very intention, I disagree with Darrell’s generalization and I take issue with his later commentary:

It's a phase that most people go through. It's called "childhood." A lot of us grow out of it. Some of us don't.

I’m writing with the purpose of arguing against the idea that tattooing’s primary benefit is to generate public interest and is a hallmark of immature personalities. There are many people out there whose feelings are similar to Darrell’s and this is for them. This is also for those wonderful guys that worked at Slave To The Needle in Seattle when I was a regular. We had some really great times, and though we’ve all scattered to the wind, I will forever remember them and their families with fondness because of what I learned and the good times had.

Tattooing has a very long and culturally significant history. According to the Wikipedia entry for tattoo, the practice can be dated back as far as 3300 BC, on the remains of a corpse dubbed “Otzi the Iceman”. Also noted in the entry is the fact that “tattooing has been a practice of almost every known people”. Notably, especially with regards to American puritanical sentiment toward the practice, Leviticus 19:28 prohibits heathen tattooing as a form of self-mutilation. It doesn’t say anything about the practice being juvenile or immature, though. Of course, immediately before that Leviticus 19:27 prohibits a man cutting his beard. The prevalence of tattooing, or tatau as it is traditionally known, is pervasive across all continents and for as long humanity has been “civilized”, which I believe gives it some credence as a valid form of human expression.

By now most, if not all, of us are familiar with ta moko, or the traditional form of tattoo practiced by the Maori tribe of New Zealand. If you’re not, here’s the rundown: primarly men, and to a smaller degree women, of the tribe are tattooed with designs concentrating around, though not limited to, the facial area. The male version covers the entire face with a combination of designs, and each component has a meaning and a name. The female version is on the lips and chin only. From the survey reading I've done, ta moko is fairly representative of the style and purpose of most tribal tattoo, be it Hawai'ian, Polynesian, North American Native, or any manner of others that range across the globe. According to a historical reference about tattoo by Steve Gilbert, “an elegantly tattooed face was a great source of pride to a warrior, for it made him fierce in battle and attractive to women”. Generally, being attractive to women and being a fierce warrior would be part of adulthood, for finding a mate and then protecting that mate and any progeny. These don’t sound like circumstances most adolescents undertake consciously. Interestingly,Library Journal's review on Amazon recommends Gilbert’s book, and says “While the text is not academic in tone, Gilbert supports his research with an extensive reference citation list and bibliography”. Sounds like this might be an interesting read with great pictures for anyone actually interested in learning about tattoo.

In our own country, tattooing isn’t legal on a person under 18 years of age, with the exception of a couple of states that allow it for minors 16 or older accompanied by a parent. Now, most of us weren’t all that mature at 18, so just about every decision we made had negative consequences and became an opportunity to learn. Though I didn’t run right out on my 18th birthday and get one, I did put down a little cash to get a tat on the back of my neck the week my best friend and I moved to Seattle. It is a combination of flash art, so it isn’t terribly original either. The pain was intense, but I was hooked. Since then, I’ve only bothered to allocate enough funds to get a second tattoo, but the plan is to get many more down the road. My second, a three-line triquetra about four inches on a side, is on my sternum just below my breasts. In the future, Joe and I would like to tattoo our children’s footprints on our forearms, and I really want to get the back of my right calf done in a phoenix holding a broadsword. I haven’t chosen to walk this path as a means of getting attention, but rather I enjoy the process and what each tattoo represents.

My own mothers are both opposed to the art of tattoo, though for different reasons. Actually, my mom-mom hasn’t shared her reason with me that I know of, but when I first started talking about getting a tat when I was twelve (I was a little fixated on being a grown-up) she told me I could count on her to kick me out of the house if I ever came home tattooed. It was the only thing she disapproved of so totally that I would no longer share a roof with her if I did it. Best friend’s mom, my other mother, comes from a very hippie perspective: she believes the human body is beautiful just the way it is, and hates to think of her babies getting themselves permanently drawn on. She also feels that make-up is unnecessary, to say nothing of plastic surgery, or my favorite, piercing. Their opposition really hasn’t stopped the rest of us: both my sibs and my father have tats, and my best friend and her husband have several. If Jack ever decides he wants something permanent, my only prohibition will be that he puts together enough money to get a really good one (that was my mistake with my first), and if he wants I’ll help him with finding an artist and payola.


Year of the Dragon Posted by Hello

I can think of so much more that I want to say, but I’m finding it hard to fit into one little post. I don’t want to write a novel here, that would just bug everybody. I’m going to do the next best thing; I’m going to start a series and from now on Tuesday will be dedicated to the subject of tattoos. Tat-Tuesday too cheesy?
posted by Meepers, 6/24/2005 06:45:00 PM

9 Comments:

People who get all wierd about tattoos remind me of people who are jealous of someone with a lot of friends. How does it hurt anybody else? I love my daughter's tattoos. They make her an even more interesting person than she was when she started, and that's saying something. I love my own tattoo. I got it for my 60th birthday present to myself. And when I feel the urge, I'll get another one, if I can find something beautiful and/or meaningful. I went to a convent school, and the nuns used to tell us that a lady wears only a watch and pearls. I wish they could see my wrist--I took off my watch so I could have my tattoo there. I didn't have pearls, but maybe I'll have a set tattooed on. And I love it if people remark on my wrist, but I did it for me, and for my sister who gave me a beautiful bracelet that just cried for a complementary set of stars. And by the way, the release I signed said: "Be careful what you choose. Something that you love now can look pretty silly when you're 30." I was still laughing when it was finished.
commented by Blogger Lorna, 6/24/2005 11:20:00 PM  
Meeps- I've been offline all week and totally stressed out by the work schedule, so I was just catching up today. Geez, I cannot believe the thread that grew out of Darrell's tattoo post on his blog. I made the first comment, just about the characters I've seen on Hollywood Blvd., which is kind of a showplace of personal expression, and I didn't revisit that thread until today.

YOU have nailed it- "I’m writing with the purpose of arguing against the idea that tattooing’s primary benefit is to generate public interest and is a hallmark of immature personalities."

Darrell's claim that a lot of people who get tattoos just to make a statement no more complex than "look at me NOW" shows what a vast reservoir of ignorance the man harbors- his post was entirely judgemental, especially that part.

I don't have any tattoos- never have, never will. I stay moderately conservative and even though I used to wear my hair semi-long with a mustache and goatee, I don't anymore. My conservative look is my personal expression, and screw anyone who doesn't like it.

MRS. DAVE, on the other hand, has always been one to dye her hair varying shades of color (particularly purple), do a few piercings and sport a few tattoos (including a snake named MOSES wrapped around her left ankle), and screw anyone who doesn't like THAT.

We've both been judged on occasion by our appearance- SHE when we're with a crowd of conservatives (and they can't believe I would marry someone like that) and ME when we're with a crowd of eclectics (and they wonder what in the hell she sees in me)..

Yeah, we're the Felix and Oscar of 2005.

Of course, we don't really care much what others think, but it's kind of sad when people get that shallow and narrow minded.

There are much more important things to be concerned about in this world- what markings and/or jewelry someone would choose to put on their own body (or NOT) and what color they choose to put in their hair is like WAAAAY down the list.

Some of the most awesome people I've ever met have tats up and down their arms along with body piercings and some pretty wild hair designs- and some of the most despicable people I've known wear nice suits and have military haircuts.. AND VICE VERSA. It works both ways.

To draw conclusions about someone's character based solely on their appearance is pretty shallow in itself, and shows a lack of character in that particular person.

Jodie (where in the heck has she been?) impresses me as someone who is basically in the south (does Oklahoma count?) and who's fairly conservative, but she enjoys all sorts of people and doesn't pass judgement on how someone looks. I think that her experience as a psych nurse has shown her that personality and character are way more than skin deep.

LORNA- YOU GO, GIRL!!! That's totally impressive :-) Happy belated 60th, BTW.
commented by Blogger Rhodester, 6/26/2005 03:04:00 AM  
I have my nose pierced and LOVE it...I think that it is also important to note that there is nothing wrong with "look at me now" What is wrong with wanting attention or wanting people to see your tatoos or piercings??? I guess because vanity is one of those deadly sins? Don't we all do the "look at me now" thing at some point in our lives--especially at class reunions...don't we brag about our families, careers, houses, cars, ect. Or maybe that's just the rich republicans...I'm not defending vanity, I'm just saying that all of us are guilty of it and you can't pick and choose "liberal" doings such as tatoos and piercings and leave out the conservative crap such as "look how many terrorists we've killed today!"

sorry for going in a totally different direction...I am random ranting today
commented by Blogger Slade, 6/26/2005 10:41:00 AM  
Dave: Darrell's claim that a lot of people who get tattoos just to make a statement no more complex than "look at me NOW" shows what a vast reservoir of ignorance the man harbors- his post was entirely judgemental, especially that part.

However, a my blog, in response to the original picture I posted, Dave wrote: That guy would fit right in on Hollywood Blvd. When I lived and worked up there, I saw people that made that guy look like Pat Boone.

Smooth, Dave... you've gone from joining me in judging the tattooed guy to joining Meepers in judging me. I think the word for that is... uh, I'll just stick to "double-jointed."

If I'd had any idea I was opening this can of worms, I'd probably have never posted that first picture. Nonetheless, I remain unswayed. The guy looks like a freak... and guess what, I'd be willing to bet that he WANTS people like me to think he looks like a freak. I'd bet that nothing makes him happier than for a southern Christian white conservative like me to be appalled by his look.

You guys can go the relativism route if you want. I'll keep calling them like I see 'em. If that gets me branded intolerant, closed-minded, or, in the considerable opinion of Dave Rhodester, "ignorant," than so be it. If I'm not pissing off certain kinds of people, I'm not staying true to myself. I can live with that.
commented by Blogger Darrell, 6/26/2005 06:27:00 PM  
Darrell, yes I said that guy would fit right in on Hollywood Blvd. and there are people there that would make him look like Pat Boone.. tis a fact. Just an observation, not a judgement, because guess what? Some of them were my friends. And some of them were so extravagant they made the guy in your pic look pretty conservative by comparison. That's what I meant.

I didn't call the guy in the pic, or any of the Hollywood Blvd. peeps "freaks". That's your department. Sorry you misunderstood me, I'll have to remember to talk slower and not use big words when addressing southern conservatives in the future.
commented by Blogger Rhodester, 6/26/2005 10:26:00 PM  
Rhodester: I'll have to remember to talk slower and not use big words when addressing southern conservatives in the future

Or, you could just type blanks instead of words… then go back and fill in the ones you decide on when you’re done vacillating. Maybe you can even get a keyboard that props up on the floor... I imagine that typing while lying down is easier for the spineless.
commented by Blogger Darrell, 6/26/2005 11:42:00 PM  
**sigh** Well Darrell, I'm usually not mean online and I don't care for participating in flame wars. It's just that when you said that basically anyone who chooses to tattoo themselves are freaks who refuse to grow up, it REALLY pissed me off since my wife has recently had some tattoos applied, so I took it rather personally. But I recognize it's your opinion and you're entitled to it.

Now I'm going to go hang out with some gay friends, some tattood friends and some black friends (one guy is actually all three), so you can go on back to "The Southern Bigot" now and rant.

Bye.
commented by Blogger Rhodester, 6/26/2005 11:58:00 PM  
Dave:It's just that when you said that basically anyone who chooses to tattoo themselves are freaks who refuse to grow up, it REALLY pissed me off

Dave, you are a total f'ing dolt. I have tattoos. My wife has tattoos. I never said, nor even implied, that ANYONE who has tattoos is a freak who refuses to grow up. I said that people who cover themselves head to toe in ink, or piercings, or boob jobs, or plastic surgery, etc... might just qualify for that title. Try to read what your commenting on before you comment in the future. Now scurry on off to your black gay gangbang, or whatever you have in mind for the night. It sounds wonderful. I'll just eat some grits, clean my rifle, and read the Bible. Toodaloo, sh!thead.
commented by Blogger Darrell, 6/27/2005 12:13:00 AM  
Poor Meepers! Sorry I had to go and poke the bear, since you probably get all of these emailed to you, like I do mine. I'm done now though, and won't revisit the thread or the topic.

Love, "Shithead"
commented by Blogger Rhodester, 6/27/2005 01:17:00 AM  

Add a comment